Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Impact of Governor’s Proposed Health and Human Services Cuts

Day 4 of Budget Conference Committee reviewed the governor’s proposals to cut almost $5 billion in funding for programs benefiting our seniors, women and children, developmentally disabled, and the poor. In reaction to these cuts at today’s hearing, a member of the public testified that a society which is able but unwilling to provide for its most vulnerable citizens is a contemptible society.

Consider this partial list of the governor’s proposed cuts to health and humans services:

· Elimination of the CalWORKs program;
· Elimination of the Healthy Families Program;
· Eliminating certain Medi-Cal state-only programs;
· Elimination of community based services programs at the Department of Aging;
· Eliminate State funding for Community Care Licensing;
· Elimination of remaining General Fund for Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health;
· Elimination of funding for community clinic programs, such as Rural Health Services and the Seasonal and Agricultural and Migratory work programs;
· Elimination of funding for drug treatment programs established by the voters through Proposition 36;
· Reducing in-home supportive services eligibility and care provider pay;
· Reducing funding for foster care rates; and
· Reducing SSI/SSP monthly payments benefiting the aged and disabled to the minimum allowed under federal law.

All of us know someone who will be affected by these cuts. This is not just a matter of balancing the state’s books. For some Californians, it is a matter of life and death.

A society in crisis should not throw women, children, and seniors overboard first.

Where are the effects of these cuts most likely to be felt in California? Consider these three maps, which provide a snapshot into the communities which rely the most on the health and human services budget.














5 comments:

helpamotherout said...

Thank you for starting this blog on the Ca budget. You are right when you say that a crisis is not the time to throw women, children, and seniors overboard FIRST. We will continue to follow your blog to educate ourselves on what is at stake. -LT from helpamotherout.org

jenntito2000 said...

I'm a mother who will be receiving CALWORKS. I am so scared there will be nothing to help me get a job that will help me afford to care for my 3 children. My kid's father is illegal and has been out of work since everify started. I have no help and no family. I'm worried about living on the streets with a 3 month old. I was in a shelter in Portland for almost 3 months. I came here because I knew there was help and that I could rent a room and not be on the streets. I was hoping to have a job by now, but that's not panning out. Now I'm worried my only source of funds... bus pass, ability to wash clothes, day care funding etc will be taken away. These are things that I need to look for work and I really need to get back to school and get a career. I want to not have to worry about homelessness, I fear we will become a 3rd world country in California soon. I love this state its the nice place I've lived all of my life. My kid's father family helps me every once in a while but even they are out of work, and they have legal papers. I worry for all those people being laid off, but sadly its worse in other states. When I was in Portland they told in the public aid office to start prostituting if I had too.I won't do that, but I fear many women will start doing there if there is no help available.

open said...

Thanks a lot for the information. I heard among state-only medi-cal program like dialysis, treatment for breast and cervial cancer for women over 65 will be cut. Very surprising. Seems for dialysis, there're alternatives. But for cancer, every kind of treatment is cut, pills, surgery, chemo, radiation? If the early stage treatment is not covered, this is going to cost more in the emergency room. And what about say, a quarterly-phased-out approach on these cut? Please let us know. Thanks so much,

Olaf said...

The Governor and the State need to take a serious look at slashing the budget (at least temporarily) for the CHP (California Highway patrol).

here's why:

1) Nearly everyday (at ~11am) I get to enjoy watching 3-to-5 uniformed CHP (3-4 motorcycles and maybe a cruiser) gather at the local Starbucks on the corner of Date and Madison Avenue, Sacramento – to drink coffee & smoke cigars for 40 minutes by the dumpster - I kid you not!

2) According to the California legislative analysts office: The operational yearly budgets (with an 's') for the CHP appears incomplete (that's an understatement) - see link - row '#378' in the Excel spreadsheet.

See link: http://www.lao.ca.gov/sections/econ_fiscal/Historical_Expenditures_Pivot.xls

3) Data is also incomplete regarding trial court revenues - see row '#24' in excel the spreadsheet.

See link: http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/laomenus/lao_menu_economics.aspx

...of which most are infractions.

Rather than the draconian cuts being proposed - think of the vast tracks of suburb streets with CHP pulling folks over for no front license plate – with resulting court fee generation measured in what (?) 30-to-50 seconds of CHP operational costs?...is not a sustainable model right now.

Cut the CHP by 2/3 and you would effectively see little to no impact to public safety. City and county police/sheriff already handle the bulk of ALL policing anyway. Leave the CHP to the states freeways – we simply cannot afford their cigar habit right now.

- Olaf Brescia / Sacramento, CA

Max said...

What a great health article, this is really what I am looking for. Thanks.

Post a Comment